Marking ECE912 Livejournals
I've been having some interesting thoughts while reading through the journals... I'm enjoying them a lot,though I'm shocked at how few students bothered to correct their writing problems in the selections handed in. I did deduct for spelling and grammar. But almost nothing at all.
Many students have made wonderful points and insights. That said, some have disturbed me. Some folks are upset by the idea of being creative online, writing online and communicating online. Everyone always agrees that doing things face to face is usually preferable. But most people are passive in the 'real world'. What is better: passive in the real world or creative online? Yes, perhaps creative in the real world is best, but that's not the question. Many people do not have creative opportunities in the physical world. Many people's creativity cannot be supported in the real world. Many people don't have friends withwhom they can share their creativity in the real world. Should they be left out? Personally, I write fiction in the real world, but I share it online. MY online friends are my 'real world' friends who are too far away at the moment.
My second point builds on this... why do you assume that there is one 'real world'? There is nothing in human experience that assumes this. And why do you assume that there is only one you? Experience is multiple. People change. The adult is: parent, child, worker, caregiver, lover, puritan, epicurian. The real world is: work, home, spiritual place, play space...
And much of the real world and real person is virtual... it is imaginary... what's wrong with this?
The question is, then, what does technology add or remove from all this?
Of course, diapers and cars and chairs are all technology. And you like them... so what's the problem?
Just my thoughts while reading...
And if you are reading this, why not comment... then I know you're being a good student :)
Further thoughts:
Every*thing* use in modern society were *new* technologies once. Why are they ok now? Will computers become an old technology that you don't think about any more? Like diapers?
Many students have made wonderful points and insights. That said, some have disturbed me. Some folks are upset by the idea of being creative online, writing online and communicating online. Everyone always agrees that doing things face to face is usually preferable. But most people are passive in the 'real world'. What is better: passive in the real world or creative online? Yes, perhaps creative in the real world is best, but that's not the question. Many people do not have creative opportunities in the physical world. Many people's creativity cannot be supported in the real world. Many people don't have friends withwhom they can share their creativity in the real world. Should they be left out? Personally, I write fiction in the real world, but I share it online. MY online friends are my 'real world' friends who are too far away at the moment.
My second point builds on this... why do you assume that there is one 'real world'? There is nothing in human experience that assumes this. And why do you assume that there is only one you? Experience is multiple. People change. The adult is: parent, child, worker, caregiver, lover, puritan, epicurian. The real world is: work, home, spiritual place, play space...
And much of the real world and real person is virtual... it is imaginary... what's wrong with this?
The question is, then, what does technology add or remove from all this?
Of course, diapers and cars and chairs are all technology. And you like them... so what's the problem?
Just my thoughts while reading...
And if you are reading this, why not comment... then I know you're being a good student :)
Further thoughts:
Every*thing* use in modern society were *new* technologies once. Why are they ok now? Will computers become an old technology that you don't think about any more? Like diapers?
On the "real world" and "new technology"
As for everything being new technology once upon a time - if the technology today stayed usable and wasn't constantly being upgraded or changed all together, there might be a more positive response to it from people like me.
Being creative on-line is one thing I can say that I understand. I can also understand why others may feel negatively toward partaking in this. I think it's fair to say that this experience is new to many of us and as such, can be a bit strange. In time, I expect that more people will respond positively to keeping blogs as the experience becomes more familiar. Then again, if the technology changes . . .
Vanessa
Re: On the "real world" and "new technology"
Re: On the "real world" and "new technology"